Effect of Multi-Variable Mix Composition on the Setting Time and Flow Properties of Fly Ash-GGBFS Geopolymer Mortar

Authors

  • Bayu Rahmat Ramadhan Tadulako University Author
  • Andi Arham Adam Universitas Tadulako Author
  • Sri Nur Akifa Universitas Tadulako Author
  • Suci Amalia Namira Wahidin Universitas Tadulako Author
  • Novacharisma Vindiantri Verucha Universitas Tadulako Author
  • Misel Borro Allo Universitas Tadulako Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35334/be.v9i2.310

Keywords:

fly ash, GGBFS, MORTAR, SETTING TIME, WORKABILITY

Abstract

The development of eco-friendly construction materials increasingly emphasizes the utilization of industrial waste, with fly ash being a prominent alternative binder to Portland cement. However, Type F fly ash exhibits limitations due to its inherently low calcium (CaO) content, which results in slow geopolymerization reactivity and typically necessitates high-temperature curing to achieve optimal early strength. This research aims to optimize the utilization of 100% fly ash as a binder in geopolymer mortar by incorporating Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS). GGBFS serves as a source of reactive calcium, specifically to accelerate C-A-S-H gel formation. The alkaline activator used comprises NaOH and Na₂SiO₃ solutions, varied at specific ratios. The experimental program investigates the influence of three key parameters: GGBFS content (10%, 20%, and 30% by fly ash weight), activator/binder ratio (30%, 35%, and 40%), and aggregate/binder ratio (2.25, 2.5, and 2.75). The primary focus is to evaluate their effect on the fresh properties of geopolymer mortar, particularly flowability and setting time, under ambient curing conditions (without heat treatment). The findings of this study are expected to demonstrate that GGBFS addition significantly enhances early reactivity and facilitates the development of geopolymer mortar suitable for ambient temperature applications. This research is anticipated to contribute to the advancement of sustainable construction materials through the optimal utilization of industrial waste, especially for applications where high-temperature curing is impractical.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, A. 2009. “Strength and Durability Properties of Alkali Activated Slag and Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete.” (August).

Adam, Andi Arham. 2019. “The Effects of Water to Solid Ratio, Activator to Binder Ratio, and Lime Proportion on the Compressive Strength of Ambient-Cured Geopolymer Concrete.” Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum 5(2): 161. doi:10.22146/jcef.43878.

Amer, Ismail, Mohamed Kohail, M. S. El-Feky, Ahmed Rashad, and Mohamed A. Khalaf. 2021. “A Review on Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete.” Ain Shams Engineering Journal 12(2): 1475–99. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2020.12.003.

ASTM C191-19. 2019. Standard Test Methods for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle.

Biondi, Lorena, Marcus Perry, Christos Vlachakis, Z Wu, Andrea Hamilton, and Jack McAlorum. 2019. “Ambient Cured Fly Ash Geopolymer Coatings for Concrete.” Materials 12: 923. doi:10.3390/ma12060923.

Calfee, Robert, and Dorothy Piontkowski. 2016. Handbook of Reading Research Design and Analysis of Experiments. doi:10.2307/2983009.

Columb, Malachy, and M S Atkinson. 2015. “Statistical Analysis: Sample Size and Power Estimations.” BJA Education. doi:10.1093/bjaed/mkv034.

Divanedari, Hadi, and Hamid Eskandari-Naddaf. 2020. “Insights into Surface Crack Propagation of Cement Mortar with Different Cement Fineness Subjected to Freezing/Thawing.” Construction and Building Materials 233: 117207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117207.

Duxson, Peter, Ana Fernández-Jiménez, John Provis, G Lukey, Angel Palomo, and Jannie Van Deventer. 2007. “Geopolymer Technology: The Current State of the Art.” Journal of Materials Science 42: 2917–33. doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z.

Fang, Yunhui, Xiaofang Zhang, Dongming Yan, Zhijun Lin, Xiuxing Ma, Junying Lai, Yi Liu, et al. 2024. “Correction: Fang et al. Study on Dispersion, Adsorption, and Hydration Effects of Polycarboxylate Superplasticizers with Different Side Chain Structures in Reference Cement and Belite Cement. Materials 2023, 16, 4168.” Materials 17: 2120. doi:10.3390/ma17092120.

Jensen, Willis. 2017. “Book Review of Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments 4th Edition.” Journal of Quality Technology 49: 186–88. doi:10.1080/00224065.2017.11917988.

Kehinde, Oluyemi, David J Hughes, and Emeka H Amalu. 2024. “Critical Methods of Geopolymer Feedstocks Activation for Suitable Industrial Applications.” Heliyon 10(9): e29771. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29771.

Loekito, Irfan, and Arie Wardhono. 2018. “PENGARUH VARIASI NaOH DAN Na2SiO3 TERHADAP KUAT TEKAN DRY GEOPOLYMER MORTAR PADA KONDISI RASIO FLY ASH TERHADAP AKTIFATOR 2,5 : 1.”

Palomo, A, J L G. Bollo, M T Blanco-Varela, and L Fernández-Jiménez. 2016. “Geopolymers from Industrial By-Products: An Updated Review.” Construction and Building Materials VL 109: 268–81.

Ramachandran, V S, Ralph Paroli, James Beaudoin, and Ana Delgado. 2002. “Supplementary Cementing Materials and Other Additions.” In , 293–353. doi:10.1016/B978-081551487-9.50010-4.

Rashidian-Dezfouli, Hassan, and Prasada Rao Rangaraju. 2017. “A Comparative Study on the Durability of Geopolymers Produced with Ground Glass Fiber, Fly Ash, and Glass-Powder in Sodium Sulfate Solution.” Construction and Building Materials 153: 996–1009. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.139.

Rukzon, Sumrerng, and Prinya Chindaprasirt. 2009. “Strength and Chloride Resistance of Blended Portland Cement Mortar Containing Palm Oil Fuel Ash and Fly Ash.” International Journal of Minerals Metallurgy and Materials - INT J MINER METALL MATER 16: 475–81. doi:10.1016/S1674-4799(09)60083-2.

Singh, Nakshatra. 2018. “Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Binder: A Future Construction Material.” Minerals 8: 299. doi:10.3390/min8070299.

Temuujin, J., A. Van Riessen, and K. J.D. MacKenzie. 2010. “Preparation and Characterisation of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Mortars.” Construction and Building Materials 24(10): 1906–10. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.012.

Vijayan, Dhanasingh, Dinesh Kumar, Mohammed Aamir, Muhammed Shahim, and Gokul Balagopal. 2020. “Experimental Investigation On Partial Replacement Of Coarse Aggregate With Shredded Rubber For Concrete.” 29: 2411–23.

Downloads

Published

19-08-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Effect of Multi-Variable Mix Composition on the Setting Time and Flow Properties of Fly Ash-GGBFS Geopolymer Mortar. (2025). Borneo Engineering: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 9(2), 196-207. https://doi.org/10.35334/be.v9i2.310