Pertumbuhan umkm belum menjamin inklusi ekonomi: bukti kabupaten/kota di kalimantan utara
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35334/2t8qpk96Kata Kunci:
UMKM, Pembangunan inklusif, Pengangguran, Kemiskinan, Kalimantan UtaraAbstrak
Promosi UMKM secara luas diharapkan dapat meningkatkan lapangan kerja dan mengurangi kemiskinan, namun perluasan administratif mungkin tidak mencerminkan transformasi produktif. Penelitian ini mengkaji apakah pertumbuhan jumlah usaha UMKM yang tercatat disertai dengan penurunan tingkat pengangguran dan kemiskinan di seluruh kabupaten dan kota di Kalimantan Utara. Panel regional seimbang direkonstruksi dari data administratif sekunder dan diaudit untuk memastikan reproduktifitasnya. Tren deskriptif, efek tetap lokasi, efek tetap dua arah, model selisih pertama, spesifikasi logaritmik, dan pemeriksaan sensitivitas diterapkan. Temuan menunjukkan adanya perbedaan yang mencolok antara perluasan usaha terdaftar dan perubahan dalam hasil kesejahteraan. Hubungan dengan tingkat pengangguran bersifat kecil dan tidak stabil, sementara hubungan dengan kemiskinan tidak memberikan bukti yang kuat mengenai adanya perbaikan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa jumlah usaha tidak cukup dijadikan sebagai ukuran tunggal untuk mengukur pembangunan inklusif. Keunikan penelitian ini terletak pada pembedaan antara partisipasi kewirausahaan dan transformasi kewirausahaan melalui perspektif rantai konversi yang menghubungkan pendaftaran, operasi aktif, produktivitas, lapangan kerja berbayar, dan pendapatan rumah tangga. Oleh karena itu, evaluasi kebijakan harus memprioritaskan status aktif, kelangsungan usaha, kualitas pekerjaan, penghasilan, produktivitas, dan partisipasi dalam rantai nilai lokal.
Referensi
Abramowitz, J., & Joung, A. (2026). Self-employment of older workers and the transition to retirement: Using machine learning to uncover heterogeneity in work arrangements. Innovation in Aging, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igag043
Afrianty, T. W., Raharjo, K., Prakasa, Y., Abimanyu, A., & Burgess, J. (2026). Internal and external factors enhancing knowledge acquisition and digital literacy for digital business transformation: Evidence from small businesses in Indonesia. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102851
Akmatov, S., Samiev, K., Ergeshov, A., Abdyrakhmanova, T., & Boronbaev, A. (2026). The role of small enterprises in promoting economic growth and social welfare. P.A. Persona e Amministrazione, 1(1), 207-228.
Anggraeni, L., Hodijah, S., & Umiyati, E. (2026). Unlocking inclusive growth: The mediating role of e-commerce in MSME digitalization for economic development and SDGs achievement in Jambi Province, Indonesia. Economies, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14020044
Ashraf, A., & Lyons, E. (2026). Complementing business training with access to finance: Evidence from SMEs in Kenya. Journal of Development Economics, 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103645
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Kalimantan Utara. (2022). Data jumlah pengangguran, kemiskinan, dan UMKM kabupaten/kota, 2017-2022. https://kaltara.bps.go.id/
Doroshenko, S. V., & Shorokhova, I. S. (2026). The employment structure of small and medium-sized enterprises: Northern location and other factors. Sever i Rynok: Formirovanie Ekonomiceskogo Poradka, 29(1), 16-31. https://doi.org/10.37614/2220-802X.1.2026.91.002
Eronmwon, I., Omorogbe, I., Edobor, E. W., & Obiosa, N. (2026). Do agrifood SMEs survive differently across value chain segments and regions? Evidence from a cross-regional survival analysis. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-12-2025-0592
Gupta, R., & Singh, B. P. (2026). Effect of access to finance and investment climate on the performance of small and medium enterprises in India. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-026-00642-9
Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press.
Karanasios, S., Senyo, P. K., Zorina, A., & Effah, J. (2026). Digital bricolage and its limits: How microenterprises undertake digitalization in resource-constrained environments. Information Systems Research, 37(1), 526-548. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0193
Khurshid, H., & Snell, R. S. (2021). Examining mechanisms for creating shared value by Asian firms. Journal of Business Research, 129, 122-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.030
Leckė, G., & Legenzova, R. (2026). Exploring the gap in the dynamic financial resilience of urban and rural SMEs. Economies, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14050160
Mekonnen, D. A., & de Brauw, A. (2026). Assessing the role of food MSMEs in providing employment for women and youth in Ethiopia. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-026-00622-z
Mergenbayeva, A., Nurasheva, K., Abishova, A., & Urazbayeva, G. (2026). Research on the shadow economy and assessment of its scale: On the example of Kazakhstan. Economies, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14040135
Musa, H., & Chinniah, M. (2016). Malaysian SMEs development: Future and challenges on going green. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 254-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.457
Phuong, C. T. M., & Thuy Anh, T. (2026). Challenging the displacement myth: Technology, innovation, and employment in Vietnam. Innovation and Development, 16(1), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2025.2501457
Pramanik, M. A., Kayes, A. N. M., Fahim, A. U., & Tuba, K. M. H. (2026). SME development for poverty alleviation using GIS and AHP-based multi-criteria decision analysis. Sustainable Futures, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101598
Safitri, K. A., Wijaya, C., & Huseini, M. (2026). Entrepreneurial ecosystem constraints for MSME resilience: Evidence from Indonesian multiple-case study. Sustainability, 18(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su18125875
Subarsono, A., Rahmawati, I. Z., Laksana, L. U. A., Prabawati, V. D. N., Wessiani, N. A., & Sulistiono, B. (2026). Poverty alleviation for coastal communities through tourism development: A case study of Kulon Progo Regency. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 18(3), 767-786. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2025.2465323
Tambunan, T. (2012). UMKM di Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.
Terentyeva, M. A. (2026). Labor markets and small business employment in northern regions: Regional and sectoral characteristics. Sever i Rynok: Formirovanie Ekonomiceskogo Poradka, 29(2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.37614/2220-802X.2.2026.92.007
Wahyuningsih, S. (2009). Peranan UKM dalam perekonomian Indonesia. Mediagro, 5(1), 1-14.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 A.siti zelpyana , Rusdy Setiawan (Penulis)

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










