VALIDITY AND TEACHERS' RESPONSES TO THE IN ACTION LEARNING DESIGN GUIDEBOOK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35334/x8v7vv10Keywords:
Guidebook, Learning design, In Action, Mathematical connections, Validate and Teacher ResponseAbstract
This study aims to develop and validate the In Action learning design guidebook for mathematics in junior high school, as well as test teachers' responses to the guidebook. The research method refers to the Plomp development model, which includes the Preliminary Research Phase, Prototyping Phase, and Assessment Phase. The instruments used were design book assessment sheets, expert response questionnaires, and teacher response questionnaires. The results of the study based on expert validation analysis at the Assessment Phase stage showed that all indicators in the guidebook were in the valid and very valid categories (average assessment ranged from 3.17 to 3.63), indicating the feasibility of the product for implementation. Teacher response trials showed "very positive" results on small group tests (majority of aspects above 75%) and increased on field group tests (most aspects above 86%). However, there are inputs for design simplification, more in-depth explanations, and continuous assistance for usage optimization. Overall, this guidebook meets the eligibility criteria and can be implemented with several improvements based on the teacher's input to improve practicality and readability.
Keywords: Learning design, In Action, Mathematical connections, Mathematics, Teacher response.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan dan memvalidasi guidebook desain pembelajaran In Action untuk matematika di SMP, serta menguji respon guru terhadap guidebook tersebut. Metode penelitian mengacu pada model pengembangan Plomp, yang meliputi tahapan Preliminary Research, Prototyping Phase, dan Assessment Phase. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah lembar penilaian buku desain, angket respon ahli, dan angket respon guru. Hasil penelitian berdasrkan analisis validasi ahli pada tahap Assessment Phase menunjukkan bahwa semua indikator pada guidebook berada dalam kategori valid dan sangat valid (rata-rata penilaian berkisar antara 3.17 hingga 3.63), menunjukkan kelayakan produk untuk diimplementasikan. Uji coba respon guru menunjukkan hasil yang "sangat positif" pada uji kelompok kecil (mayoritas aspek di atas 75%) dan meningkat pada uji kelompok lapangan (sebagian besar aspek di atas 86%), mengindikasikan keunggulan, kesesuaian kebutuhan, serta kemudahan penggunaan dan implementasi guidebook . Meskipun demikian, terdapat masukan untuk penyederhanaan desain, penjelasan lebih mendalam, serta pendampingan berkelanjutan untuk optimalisasi penggunaan. Secara keseluruhan, guidebook ini memenuhi kriteria kelayakan dan dapat diimplementasikan dengan beberapa penyempurnaan berdasarkan masukan guru untuk meningkatkan kepraktisan dan keterbacaan.
Kata Kunci: Desain pembelajaran, In Action, Koneksi matematis, Matematika, Respon guru
Downloads
References
Agbata, B. C., Kwabi, P. A., Abraham, S., Okpako, S. O., Arivi, S. S., & K, A. G. W. (2024). Everyday Uses Of Mathematics And The Roles Of A. 19(3), 819–827.
Akker, van den, Bannan, B., Kelly, A. E., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (2010). An Introduction to Educational Design Research. Proceedings of the Seminar Conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), November 23-26, 2007.
Apriyani, & Hadiwinarto, H. (2021). Improving mathematical connection ability through the approach of scientific and reciprocal teaching. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 30(1), 84–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v30.1.3787
Ardiawan, I. K. N. (2024). Pengembangan Komik Audio Visual Pendidikan Pancasila Berorientasi Kearifan Lokal. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(4), 181–194.
Arsyad. (2016a). Model Pembelajaran Menumbuh Kembangkan Kemampuan Metakognitif (A. Juhari, Ed.). In Pustaka Refleksi, 2016.
Arsyad, N. (2016b). Model Pembelajaran Menumbuh Kembangkan Kemampuan Metakognitif (A. Juhari, Ed.). Pustaka Refleksi.
Dolapcioglu, S., & Doğanay, A. (2020). Development of critical thinking in mathematics classes via authentic learning : an action research. International Journal of Mathematical Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1819573
Febrianto, R., & Puspitaningsih, F. (2020). Pengembangan buku ajar evaluasi pembelajaran. Education Journal : Journal Education Research and Development, 4(1), 1–18.
Herlina, & Nurmala R. (2019). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berupa Game Edutainment Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Siswa. Mathematic Education and Aplication Journal (META), 1(2), 14–24.
Husnaeni, H., & Munfiatik, S. (2024). Instructional Design for Teachers. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.62017/jppi.v1i2.846
Ismiyati, N., Mulbar, U., & Rusli. (2023). Development of Procedures in Designing Blended Learning Integrated Soft Skills in Higher Education. Advances in Research, 24(6), 39–49. 10.9734/air/2023/v24i6982
Junaidi, & Wulandari, N. P. (2024). Usability Media Pembelajaran geometri berbasis geogebra untuk meningkatkan kemampuan numerasi. Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal, 6(1), 293–303.
K Wijayanti, Waluya, S. B., Kartono, & Isnarto. (2019). Mental structure construction of field independent students based on initial proof ability in APOS-based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3), 32100.
Lanny, P., Putri, K., Widiana, I. W., & Suarjana, I. M. (2024). Project-Based Learning Assessment Guidebook Project-Based Assessment with Design Approach Thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 7(1), 30–41.
Lanya, H., Zayyadi, M., Sulfiah, S. K., & Roziq, A. (2021). Students’ mathematical literacy on the performance of PISA questions: What is gender correlation? Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 8(2), 222–234. doi:10.24815/jdm.v8i2.20570
Mucti, A., & Nurmala R. (2020). Pengaruh Kemampuan Number Sense terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa di SMP Negeri 8 Tarakan. MUST: Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 5(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.30651/must.v5i1.3660
Nurmala R. (2022). Pengembangan Pocket Book Mathematic (Pockemath) Berbasis Android Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Siswa. Jurnal Proximal, 5(1), 19–29.
Nurmala R, Mulbar, U., & Darwis, M. (2025). A Design Framework for Mathematics Learning in Junior High School to Improve Students’ Mathematical Connection Ability. International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science, 4(1), 239–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63922/ijevss.v4i01.1508
Priangga, Y. S. (2021). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Aplikasi Smartphone Untuk Memfasilitasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 1116–1126.
R Septianita. (2014). Pengembangan Media Belajar Buku Saku Fisika Dengan Teknologi Augmented Reality Berbasis Android Pada Materi Fluida Statis Untuk Siswa Kelas X. Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(2), 118–124.
Rogers. (2002). Diffusion Of Preventive Innovations. Addictive Behaviours, 27(6), 989–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00300-3%0A
Susanti, S. E., Nurmala R, & Hamid, H. (2019). Pengembangan Kosami (Komik Saku Matematika) Bagi Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 7 Tarakan. Mathematic Education and Aplication Journal (META), 1(1), 37–47.
Van den Akker. (2013). Curricular development research as a specimen of education design research in Educational Design Research, eds. T. Plomp & N. Nieveen. In Educational design research.
Wardhani, S. I., & Sujarwanto. (2024). Pengembangan Panduan Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berbahasa Menggunakan Metode Maternal Reflektif Berbasis Web Bagi Guru Anak Tunarungu. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 6(6), 2973–2987.
Yupinus, Lusius;Ichsan; Ardiawan, Y. (2020). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik pada Pokok Bahasan Tabung untuk SMP Negeri 2 Nanga Taman Kelas IX. SQUARE : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 61–72.
Ziliwu, S. H., Sarumaha, R., & Harefa, D. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika pada Materi Transformasi Siswa Kelas XI SMK Negeri 1 Lahusa Tahun Pembelajaran 2020/2021. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.57094/afore.v1i1.433
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurmala R, Usman Mulbar, Muhhammad Darwis, Murtafiah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Mathematics Education and Application Journal (META) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
